Beauty and Power: Girls With Slingshots

30 Apr

There are three webcomics in my RSS feed, and my favorite is Girls With Slingshots (the other two are Dinosaur Comics, which you’ve probably heard of, and Nimona, which you should drop everything and read from the beginning right now). It has an ensemble cast and is fairly humorously self-aware. This post may be coming a little late, because it has a lot of Peiss to it and not so much Morrison, but I just started reading GWS recently, and it has a lot to say about beauty and power. GWS’ main character is named Hazel, and she has (who doesn’t?) an extremely beautiful best friend with extremely substantial breasts. Jamie gets a lot of positive attention for her appearance – in particular, lots of free drinks. (The strip where she goes to a gay bar and finds her “forces…weakening” is unsurprising.) She is definitely aware of it, and in this comic, she even talks about her boobs as something of a resource – a substitute, here, for more income:

We can talk about how this is and/or is not problematic, but I get really interested when Jamie encounters unexpected consequences. In particular, these three strips come after a married man has been sending her flowers:

I came across a link to this particular storyline recently, and I was all about Kathy Peiss and Susan Bordo. The middle strip definitely calls to mind the perceived relationship, which we discussed around Hope in a Jar, of beauty and overall worthiness (see 10-12, for example, for the assumption that outer beauty should reflect inner beauty); it contains the assumption that beauty could not be powerful enough on its own to cause trouble. But the comic immediately following rejects that notion: Jamie’s display of her body automatically draws attention.

Here we get into Bordo: “When female bodies do not efface their femaleness, they may be seen as inviting, ‘flaunting'” (6). Comics are a really great format to exaggerate this: the second Jamie is not wearing a parka, she draws just the attention she has been complaining about.

But it is not that obvious. In the last panel of the last strip, after all, Jamie is drinking a free drink. And this is something that I think ends up being really complicated in Peiss and elsewhere: if beauty is an arbitrarily conferred power, is she supposed to simply reject it? I certainly think she may as well take advantage. Somewhere there is a line, and for me I think it’s between the dependence on physical attractiveness of the winter/coffee comic above and the cynical willingness to take advantage of it in the last strip. To quote Peiss:

“Women who are beautiful or who achieve beauty according to the imposed standards are rewarded; those who cannot or choose not to be beautiful are punished, economically and socially.” (269)

I think I am willing to accept the first clause of that sentence but have a problem with the second. But I’m curious about your perspectives: what is an acceptable leveraging of beauty?

PS This comic has a lot more in it that’s pertinent to this class/blog, though definitely more heavily in the beauty than race category.


Kathy Peiss, Hope in a Jar (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998).

Susan Bordo, Unbearable Weight (Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press, 1959).


Posted by on April 30, 2013 in Uncategorized


Tags: ,

2 responses to “Beauty and Power: Girls With Slingshots

  1. emilypatriciamarie

    May 3, 2013 at 3:41 pm

    I’ve been reading this comic recently, too! (And I’ve been meaning to read Nimona for a while; I love Gingerhaze!) There’s definitely a lot to talk about regarding beauty in GWS. This arc in particular highlights the pervasive, objectifying nature of the male gaze. One thing that I think is really interesting about the strip in the flower shop in light of Peiss is that in an attempt to cover up her “personality and charm”, Jamie immediately covers her face! This is reminiscent of the ideas presented in Peiss, that the face is a window to one’s virtues and/or vices.

    • Nikki

      May 5, 2013 at 5:35 pm

      Definitely! That idea that internal “beauty” is the real/primary attraction and outward beauty should be a reflection is totally declared by this man the whole time that she’s getting attention obviously based only on her appearance – that’s something I find super amusing. I mean, fairly unfortunate and unreasonable, but fairly pointed. One of the things about GWS that I like is that I think it’s fairly self-aware about things like that.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: